sambak

Mardi 14 octobre 2008 2 14 /10 /Oct /2008 07:18

Qatar University Political Science Professor Muhammad Al-Musfir: All Arab Leaders Should Commit Suicide; Tzipi Livni Is a "Creature"

 

Following are excerpts from an interview with Muhamamd Al-Musfir, a professor of political science at Qatar University, which aired on Al-Rai TV on September 24, 2008:

Muhammad Al-Musfir: The Arab leaders should all commit suicide, because they are responsible for the tragedy in Iraq. Look what these Arab leaders are doing together with Iran and the United States – they are competing among themselves who will warn the U.S. against attacking Iran. I am happy about this, by the way.

[...]

It is a lie that I coordinated between Shimon Peres and Hamas.

Interviewer: Have you met with Shimon Peres?

Muhammad Al-Musfir: I never have, and I never will. My hand will never shake the hand of a Zionist – even if it is chopped off.

Interviewer: Tzipi Livni was in Doha a few days ago...

Muhammad Al-Musfir: Yes...

Interviewer: You have a dissenting view with regard to the Doha conference as well...

Muhammad Al-Musfir: Not with regard to the conference itself, but with regard to her participation in the conference. I wrote in the local papers... Allah be praised, in Qatar, we can exercise freedom of expression without being harmed. I wrote about the Doha conference and about the participation of the Israeli foreign minister in it that it is not necessary for this "creature" – I call her a "creature" – to participate in such an international conference, because she would divert the conference away from its real goals – democracy and its consolidation, not only in Qatar, but in the Arab world in particular, and in the Third World in general. Therefore, such a woman – or rather, such a "creature" – would reduce the value of the conference.

[...]

Your Al-Zawraa TV was viewed throughout the Arab world. Why did they eliminate it? Because it presented the achievements of the Iraqi resistance and the failures of the occupation, its collaborators, and its thieves. It explained all this to the viewers, and it was the most popular channel, with the exception of Al-Jazeera – if not as popular as Al-Jazeera TV. They killed this channel. Who did? The Arab regimes. On whose orders? The Americans and the Israelis.

Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Mercredi 17 septembre 2008 3 17 /09 /Sep /2008 06:27
Kazem Jalali : l'AIEA s’entête dans son approche illogique du dossier nucléaire iranien Téhéran.Irna.16 Septembre 2008. International. Iran. Un membre de la commission de sécurité nationale et de politique étrangère du parlement iranien, Kazem Jalali, a déclaré mardi que l'AIEA a entrepris de suivre une approche illogique dans le cadre de l'accord signé entre l’Iran et l'AIEA l'année dernière pour résoudre les questions restées en suspens au sujet du programme nucléaire de l'Iran. Répondant aux questions des journalistes en marge d’une réunion de l’assemblée nationale, il a rappelé que conformément à l'accord mutuel entre l'Iran et l'AIEA, l'agence proposait de répondre à six questions exceptionnelles pour mettre un terme à ce débat. L'Iran a entièrement répondu aux questions posées par l'AIEA, a-t-il précisé, ajoutant que le directeur général de l’agence onusienne, Mohamed El-Baradei a déclaré qu’in n’y avait pas de déviation d programme nucléaire de l’Iran à des fins militaires dans son rapport. Les activités nucléaires de l’Iran qui sont de nature pacifique se sont poursuivies sous l’étroite surveillance directe de l'AIEA, a précisé Kazem Jalili ajoutant que les inquiétudes de certains quant aux activités nucléaires de l'Iran ne reposent sur aucune base juridique. Il a déclaré que les Etats-Unis lancent des allégations sans fondement sur les activités nucléaires de l'Iran et politise la question. L'AIEA "ne doit pas s'attendre à ce que l'Iran réponde à n'importe quelle allégation" sur son programme nucléaire, a déclaré Allaeddine Boroujerdi, chef de la Commission parlementaire des Affaires étrangères. « Le nouveau rapport de Mohammad El-Baradei comme le précédent est un rapport à double tranchant. » a-t-il poursuivi soulignant que ce rapport atteste de la non-déviation des activités nucléaires de l'Iran et souligné que l'Iran a poursuivi sa coopération avec l'AIEA mais a soulevé la question de prétendues études menées par l’Iran. Les interlocuteurs iraniens de l'AIEA ont qualifié ces documents d'"allégations sans fondement". Le président de la Commission des Affaires étrangères du parlement a déclaré aujourd'hui que l'Iran n'entendait pas répondre à toute "allégation" de l'AIEA, une allusion aux "prétendues études" sur un possible volet militaire du programme nucléaire de Téhéran. "Nous ne pensons pas qu'une porte doit être ouverte pour que chaque jour les Etats-Unis présentent de nouvelles allégations sur le programme nucléaire iranien, les remettent à l'agence, et que celle-ci s'attende à ce que l'Iran fournisse des réponses", a déclaré M. Boroujerdi. Kazem Jalali a indiqué que l'Iran et l'AIEA avaient déjà convenu de comment lever les ambiguïtés rappelant les modalités de l’accord. Le représentant de l'Iran auprès de l'AIEA, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, a opposé une fin de non recevoir: l'agence ne doit "pas s'attendre à ce que nous appliquions le protocole additionnel".
Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Mardi 5 février 2008 2 05 /02 /Fév /2008 07:26
Women's Forums on Islamist Websites - Tools For Preparing Women to Carry Out Jihad and Suicide Operations
No. 419 - February 1, 2008 - D. Hazan

A number of Islamist websites include special forums for women and for the Islamic family. A review of these forums reveals that over two-thirds of their participants are men, that their objective is essentially indoctrination, and that their principal concern is with issues such as encouraging women to carry out suicide operations − for example, by relating and extolling biographies and testaments of female martyrs in Islamic history and in modern times. These forums urge women to take an active part in jihad, or at least to support its fighters through financial contributions. They also promote jihad education from an early age, publicize various sheikhs' fatwas on jihad and martyrdom, and highlight the reward that awaits both male and female martyrs in Paradise.

The following are excerpts from materials from the following websites: www.al-hesbah.org/v  – a forum for women and Islamic families; www.shmo5alislam.net/ – an Islamic women's forum; and www.al-faloja.info/vb – an Islamic family forum. 

 

"How I Hoped to Turn My Body into Slivers to Tear the Sons of Zion to Pieces, and to Knock with Their Skulls on the Gates of Paradise"

An Al-Hesbah subscriber calling herself Umm Hamza Al-Shahid wrote a message titled "Secure Yourself a Chandelier under the Throne [in Paradise]," in which she encouraged Muslim women to carry out suicide bombings. Following are excerpts:

"The souls of the martyrs dwell inside the bellies of green birds [that roost] on chandeliers hanging from the royal throne [of Allah in Paradise]. They roam freely in Paradise, and then come to roost on the chandeliers... Sister... [think] what a [wonderful] life that is, how [wonderful] Paradise is, and what we miss living here [in this world]... You know that a martyr does not die. He lives, and will never know death, for it is said [in Koran 2:153]: 'And do not speak of those who are slain in Allah's way as dead; nay, [they] live, but you do not perceive [it].'

"You surely ask: 'What is the way to martyrdom for me, as a woman?... How can I find the way?' Before I answer, let me say: Has it occurred to you that the very first Muslim who had the privilege of becoming a martyr was a woman, [namely] Sumayya bint Khayyat? She was cruelly tortured by the leader of the infidels, the bitter enemy of the faith, Abu Jahl, but remained steadfast in her religion and faith... She spat in his filthy face, leaving him no choice but to draw his sword and stab her, and then her pure body was cast in the desert of Mecca, while her pure soul ascended to Paradise... Take her example, sister. She had the honor [of becoming a martyr] before the [first] man had [this honor]. Allah does not prevent us from... following in her footsteps.  

"Sister, do you fear the horror of death and the agony of dying? [Know that] the pain felt by a martyr as he is killed is like the pain of a [wasp's] sting. Having heard this, are you still afraid to dare? Don't you wish such an end – an easy transition from this world to Paradise, without pain or agony?... Since death is inevitable, why should we not leave this transient [world] in our best capacity, [that is,] as martyrs? These are the words of one of our sisters who has already achieved this goal, Rim Al-Riyashi.[i] She was only 22 years old, and a mother of two small children, but she considered her life [in this world] of little worth [and sacrificed it] for the sake of Allah in order to wave the banner of Islam, saying in her will: 'I have long yearned for this martyrdom for the sake of Allah. I have long anticipated it. How happy I will be, and how great will be my joy if Allah accepts me as a martyr. By Allah, my heart is filled with many emotions, and I cannot control them... As if a beautiful dream were taking over my body, as if my heart were beating out the words, "Allah, accept me as a martyr." How I have yearned to turn my body into slivers that would tear the sons of Zion to pieces; and to knock with their skulls on the gates of Paradise. By Allah, even if you broke my bones and hacked me to pieces, you would not be able to destroy my faith or rip my banner. How I kept telling myself: The Jews are the enemies of Allah, so fill with hatred for them and turn your blood into a path on which you will walk to Paradise."[ii]

 

"She Penetrated Deeper into the Crowd, Her Breath Coming in Spurts and the Spark of Death Shining in Her Eyes, and... Allah Akbar!... The Body-Parts of the Jews Scattered Everywhere, and the Black Blood Spilled on the Soil of the Prophets, While Her Pure Soul Ascended to Paradise"

In another posting, headed "Indeed, Men Do Not Have a Monopoly [on Martyrdom]," Umm Hamza Al-Shahid described the last moments of a woman suicide bomber: "She recited the morning prayer... and then sat invoking [the name of] Allah until dawn. In her mind she heard the words of a brother who had [chosen] the path [of martyrdom]: 'Even if I had died while praying,[iii] I would have regretted having missed the opportunity to die as a martyr [in a war] for the sake of Allah.' She went out and walked silently... her [soul] filling with a deep and confident tranquility. She fingered the explosive belt hidden under her clothes to make sure that it was tightly fastened. She went on. Then a crowd of filthy Jews appeared in the distance and she hurried to meet them. She managed to slip into the crowd without anyone noticing her. Her heart palpitated, not out of fear of the despicable [Jews], but because her momentous meeting with Allah was drawing near. It seemed to her that the sky shone lighter and brighter than before. She penetrated deeper into the crowd, her breath coming in spurts and the spark of death shining in her eyes, and... Allah Akbar! The explosion rang out loud, violent, deafening and destructive. The body parts of the Jews scattered everywhere, and the black blood spilled on the soil of the Prophets, while her pure soul ascended to heaven, to the chandeliers [of Paradise, an abode of] light, peace and eternity."[iv]

A subscriber calling himself Sayf Allah [Sword of Allah] posted a link to a video, accompanied by a message titled "To [Women] Who Seek Martyrdom": "To our sisters on this dear forum, and to all [sisters] everywhere who are devout in their faith, here is a simple video about several women who became martyrs and who, [their final testaments,] urged others to [wage] jihad."[v]

The women's forum on the Islamist website Al-Shumoukh featured an excerpt from a book titled Jihad and Combat in Shari'a[-Based] Policy (Al-Jihad Wal-Qital Fi Al-Siyassa Al-Shar'iyya), by Dr. Muhammad Khayr Haykal, which included the following: "Martyrdom for the sake of Allah is one of the values that Islam glorifies and which confers prestige on the one who implements it... Through [martyrdom], one receives eternal life and avoids death, which is the lot of everyone else. The gates of Paradise open [before the martyr], and the life in this world goes on while the martyrs [bask in] the pleasures of Paradise... After their souls leave their bodies, Allah builds them palaces."[vi]  

 

"A Woman... [Usually] Dreams of a Husband, a Large House, Children... But There Are Other Women... Jihad Fighters... Who [Sacrifice] Their Souls alongside the Men"; "She Donned a Shroud, Strapped on the Explosive Belt, and Left... That Was the Pivotal Moment in her [Decision] to Meet Allah as a Martyr"

A subscriber calling herself Rabab Khatem wrote under the heading "Women Jihad Fighters in Modern Times Will Go Down in History": "For a long time, I have been thinking about that woman who left everything, abandoned the sweet pleasures of this world... gave up her soul and her money in order to prove herself [equal] to men... [and to prove] that the religion of Allah is more important than her [own life]... I tried to find other women like her among my people, but found only flashy TV hosts, dancers, singers, etc., who present themselves as role models for mankind, and indeed serve as role models for those who wish to follow their [unworthy] example... I have been planning to write about her for a long time... I looked for the most beautiful words that have been said about her, and found many, but none as wonderful as the those written about her by the forum subscriber Louis 'Atiyyat Allah [under the heading] 'Lament for a Muslim Woman Knight':

"'...As I write these words, my sorrow that I am not among you sears my heart. I wish I could be among you, for that would have been an immense privilege. What value is there in a pleasant life that ends in the grave, without glory that will go down [in history, and without] having faithfully served Allah's religion... [The woman knight] said: Allah, accept my blood today and be pleased with it... A woman in this world [usually] dreams of a husband, a large house, children... However, there are other women – praise them – who have decided [to sacrifice] their souls alongside with men, and are undoubtedly jihad fighters...

"The women of the courageous Chechen people have sacrificed their children and their money... They joined the march of the martyrs; they refused to [accept] oppression, and as the enemy intensified its [cruel oppression], their steadfastness and [readiness for] self-sacrifice grew ever stronger... One woman was apprehended by the Russians, and a senior Russian officer violated her honor... She swore revenge... She started preparing, counting the days until she would sacrifice her most valued possession for the sake of religion and honor. She donned a shroud, strapped an explosive belt around her body and went to him; and when the moment came, she approached him, and it was then that she consummated [her resolve] to meet Allah as a martyr...

"This is a story of young women, in the spring of their youth, who entered a Russian theater disguised as newspaper reporters, committed to martyring themselves. One of them concealed [the surprise] that she had prepared for the Russians in her camera, while the other had it wrapped around her waist. As soon as the senior regional Russian officials gathered together at the premises, the doors were locked, so that they could savor [in full] what had been prepared for them, and the end came before [the event could even] begin...  Praised be their deeds, which will go down in history."[vii]

 

"One's Heart Rejoices [at the Sight of] a Woman Whose Soul Yearns for Jihad for the Sake of Allah"

The Al-Hesbah website posted an item written by Sheikh 'Abd Al-Rahman Al-Sahim praising women who join jihad. Following are excerpts:

"By Allah, one's chest expands at the sight of processions of [martyrs] returning to Allah... One's heart beats faster at hearing about a young woman... who rises above the world of fashion and relinquishes the material world. One's soul rejoices [at the sight of] a woman with great aspirations whose soul yearns for jihad for the sake of Allah. [At the sight of such things,] I say: The nation is still sound. It is unfortunate for its enemies that they are fighting a nation which has women of such [character]...  A nation that gives rise to [women] of this kind is a nation that will never die... By Allah, my heart is ready to leap out of my breast as I read the inquiry by a young woman not yet 20 years old regarding the war against the enemies and regarding taking part in jihad through martyrdom... Today my nation needs women who bear the burden, rather than ones who are themselves a burden on the da'wa and the preachers. Therefore [I say to the women:] Be the one who bears the burden of da'wa and the banner of victory and glory."[viii]  

 

"If You Can Sacrifice Your Soul – What a Great Sacrifice That Will Be!"

The Al-Shumoukh website posted an item titled "An Appeal from the Mother of Martyrs to Her Sisters in the Forums," dated October 1, 2007, in which the anonymous author states: "My sister, you are an inseparable part of this glorious jihad, and without you no armies would advance and no banners [would be] raised. Therefore, do not underestimate the value of your effort, for it has a significant impact... If you have a friend or a relative whom you trust, try to direct them onto the path [of jihad] – and great will be your reward! Do not reveal your intentions to anyone – even to the one closest to you, since secrecy is the key to success... If you can sacrifice your soul, what a great sacrifice that will be!... Know, my dear, that the more you sacrifice, the greater your reward in this world, and also in the world to come."[ix]

 

"Why Shouldn't Contemporary Women Jihad Fighters... Sacrifice What Is Most Precious To Them, and [Give] Their Soul for the Sake of Religion?"

Another posting on Al-Hesbah, titled "The Islamic Woman Knight" by a participant who signed himself "[Admirer] of Sheikh Abu Mousab [Al-Zarqawi]," called on Muslim women to follow the example of the women of early Islam and sacrifice their souls for the sake of religion. Following are excerpts:

"My sisters, the Muslim jihad fighters... We want to follow the path of grace and jihad taken by our mothers and sisters of the early Islam. Unfortunately, [however,] the weakness of our times, which is currently besetting the Muslims, has cast a shadow on their lives, creating distortions that Islam repudiates... Why shouldn't contemporary women jihad fighters... sacrifice what is most precious to them, and [give] their souls for the sake of religion[?]... Didn't Muslim women in the days of the Prophet and the Righteous Caliphs[x] join the army and set out on jihad?... Women continued to take part in [wars waged by] Muslim armies, [helping to get] supplies, providing medical aid, and [taking part in actual] fighting – until the Muslims gradually estranged themselves from Islam, abolishing many Islamic traditions – among them those that granted women legitimacy to wage jihad."[xi] 

 

My Muslim Sister, You Bear Much of the Responsibility for the Present Defeat of Islam – Had You Fulfilled Your Mission, This Humiliation Would Not Be Plaguing the Nation

A subscriber calling herself "Martyr's Sister" urges women to fulfill their crucial mission in jihad, or at least not to obstruct a man's way to jihad. Following are excerpts:

"The woman can be a force that either impedes or spurs jihad... Our deeds must guarantee that we place the love of Allah and His Messenger, as well as the love of jihad for the sake of Allah, over and above the love of transient [things]. This is what will cause the sons of the nation to sacrifice their souls for the sake of Islam and the Muslims, and [free] us of our apathy, so that the infidel nations will never rule over our nation – for they will see that we have men who love death as much as [the infidels] love life; that we have merchants who are ready to sacrifice all their capital for the sake of the victory of our faith... and that we have mothers who cannot find peace because their fathers were not part of jihad. Given all this, it is clear that Allah's enemies will think a thousand times before [attempting to] harm [the Muslim] nation and to attack it...

"While the woman can be one of the greatest obstacles to Muslim victory, she can also be one of its crucial motivating forces, provided she fulfills her mission with utmost courage and selflessness... Moreover, Islam, in its times of prosperity, could never have achieved victory over the infidels, which surpassed it in numbers, equipment, and capital, had it not been for the woman, [who fulfilled her role] responsibly and appropriately. She is the one who raises her children to jihad and watches over the man's honor and property when he sets out to wage jihad; she is the one who bears up in the face of hardship, encouraging her children and everyone else under her guardianship to endure and follow this path – indeed, 'behind every glorious jihad fighter there is a woman.'

"The enemies of the [Islamic] nation only endeavored to liberate the woman once they realized that the [Muslim] woman is the foundation of the nation, and that if she is corrupted, everything she brings forth, and everyone around her, will be corrupted as well. They made the worst [possible] use of her, and she internalized the illusions and believed the [false] claims [regarding emancipation]... However, if today you, [the Muslim woman,] refrain from participating in the struggle and preparing for it, the nation will also refrain [from the struggle] – for then who will educate the children for this struggle, who will stand behind the men urging them to take part in this war, [and] who will raise the mothers of the next generation to complete the task you began?...

"The woman is an important element in today's struggle, and she must take part [in it], supporting it in every way and [contributing] all the resources she can muster. Her role in this struggle is by no means secondary [to the man's]; on the contrary, her participation is considered one of the foundations of victory and continuity. Therefore, my Muslim sister, it is imperative that you understand that your role is even greater than you might imagine, and that you bear much [of the responsibility] for the present defeat of Islam – for had you fulfilled your mission, this humiliation would not be plaguing the nation...  

"I am warning you of Allah's wrath... Do not stand as an obstacle on the men's path to jihad. The minimum that is required of you when the men set out on jihad is to keep quiet and be content with what Allah has commanded. You must know that when you keep the men from waging jihad, it is as if you are turning your back on Allah's ways... You are forbidden to prevent the men from embarking on jihad, unless their action would bring about perdition for you and for your children... Do not serve as a tool to be wielded by Allah's enemies to destroy the values of the nation."[xii]

 

Mother Who Lost Four Sons: "Allah Be Praised for Honoring Me with Their Martyrdom"

The Al-Faloja website posted a story describing the reaction of a mother upon being informed that her four sons had become martyrs: "The announcement did not perturb her, nor did her facial expression change; she asked the man [who had delivered the news]: Did they all die? The man said: They were [a unit] that destroyed the enemy one by one. They set up a rendezvous with martyrdom, and whenever one wavered, the other encouraged him, strengthening his resolve and motivation. The [mother] was happy... and said: Praised be Allah for honoring me with their martyrdom. I pray for Allah to let me join them in His abode. Tell me now, what fate did Allah grant you, [the jihad fighters]? He replied: We attained a decisive victory. She raised her hands to heaven and said: Praise Allah, praise Allah! Then she went off in the direction of her tent, praising Allah over and over"[xiii]

In another document, the Al-Hesbah website appeals to mothers of jihad fighters, expounding the importance of their sons' role as defenders of the faith and detailing the advantages of martyrdom: "To every mother of a jihad fighter combating Allah's enemies... You have borne us a hero – one of the Islamic heroes of which the nation is proud and who are [fighting on the various jihad] fronts... Were it not for Allah, and for [your son] and his brothers, Muslim lands would have become forfeit, and religious commandments would have been annulled; however, owing to his ideals, [your son] stands like a bastion against the enemies of religion. Hence, [as] his mother, you are blessed... Wouldn't you like your son to attest to your righteousness on Judgment Day? Wouldn't you like his death to be easy?... Wouldn't you like your son to be among the best of the martyrs of Allah's Messenger?...  Wouldn't you like Allah to extol your son before His angels?"[xiv]

 

"The Prophet Said: 'Ye Women, Give Charity, for I Have Seen That You Are the Majority in Hell...'"

Al-Hesbah posted an article from the magazine Sada Al-Jihad titled "Why Not Wage Jihad Out of Your Own Home?" and calling on women to fulfill their obligation with respect to jihad by extending financial help to jihad fighters:

"My Muslim sister! I do not believe that you have any doubts as to the importance of money for the victory of Allah's faith or regarding its role in supporting jihad... You are aware that this important aspect of jihad for the sake of Allah is mentioned in the Koran – for money is the [vital] artery of jihad... In many [Koranic] verses, Allah gives priority to jihad by means of financial [contribution], preferring it to jihad by means of martyrdom...  This is [because] the latter kind of jihad is impossible without money, while it is possible for a Muslim to wage jihad by means of his money without sacrificing his life... Furthermore, in this respect, the Islamic faith appeals specifically to women, highlighting the issue for her; thus, the Prophet said: 'Ye women, give charity, for I have seen that you are the majority in hell...' Therefore, let us be open-handed for the sake of Islam's victory and contribute our money to jihad fighters... My sister, don't you see that jihad fighters are today in urgent need of funds, since they are being subjected to ever-growing pressure?... In the history of Islam, there are exemplary cases of faithful women who contributed [everything] they had [to bring about] the victory of Allah and His Messenger, and to defend religion. Shall we not emulate them by assisting and supporting our brothers? My sister, do not forget that aiding jihad is [in itself a form of] jihad."[xv] 

 

Our Basic Mission Is to Send the Lions Forth to Battle; They Will Vouch For Us on the Day of Judgment

Another article from the magazine Sada Al-Jihad posted on Al-Hesbah, titled "Raising Children to Jihad," said: "Children's education starts while they are still in their mother's womb. An infant feels the love of Islam while still in its mother's womb – through [her] love and devotion to her faith... And when she listens to the Koran on a regular basis... her feelings are passed on to [the fetus]... This has been proven by modern research... At least during its first years, the baby needs its mother's full attention – hence, she is preoccupied only with raising the child preacher, [and] jihad fighter – to lay down the stages we shall follow together. Let us press our children to our hearts and hoist our weapons onto our backs in preparation for the ultimate [stage]. We strive to fulfill our basic mission of sending the lions forth to the battlefields, like Al-Khansaa,[xvi] and they will vouch for us on the Day [of Judgment]."[xvii]

 

*D. Hazan is a research fellow at MEMRI.



[i] Hamas member Rim Al-Riyashi carried out the January 14, 2004 suicide bombing at the Erez crossing on the Gaza border, killing four Israelis and wounding 10 others.

[iii] In Muslim tradition, death while praying is considered a mark of virtue.

[v] http://al-hesbah.com/v/showthread.php?t=123366, April 21, 2007. The link to the video is no longer active.

[x] The first four Caliphs that followed Muhammad (Abu Bakr, 'Omar, 'Uthman, and 'Ali).

[xvi] Al-Khansaa bint 'Omar was a poet of the pre-Islamic period who converted to Islam in Muhammad's time. She is considered "the mother of martyrs" because when her four sons died in the battle of Qadisiyah in 637 CE, she did not did not grieve, but said, "Praise be to Allah who honored me with their martyrdom. I pray for Allah to let me join them in Paradise."

[xvii] http://al-hesbah.com/v/showthread.php?t=118382, March 29, 2007, reproduced from Sada Al-Jihad, vol. 14, Rabi' Al-Awl 1428 (March-April 2007). 

Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Mardi 5 février 2008 2 05 /02 /Fév /2008 07:22

Commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps General Mohammad Ja'fari: If Attacked, Iran Will Target U.S. Forces in Neighboring Countries

 

Following are excerpts from an interview with General Mohammad-Ali Ja'fari, Commander of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on January 26, 2008.

Interviewer: What exactly happened in [the Hormuz Straits]?

General Mohammad-Ali Ja'fari: There was nothing exceptional about it. Our boats were carrying out their regular duties. What they do with regard to all military and regular vessels passing through the Hormuz Straits is the duty that was entrusted to the IRGC by Iran's navy. This is their mission. Our boats asked the warship to identify itself and declare its status. Since the warship refrained from doing so, the exchange between the two sides took a different course. That is not what the Americans said, of course, but I believe that since this happened on the eve of President Bush's visit, and since they wanted to present Iran as a military threat to the region, they fabricated this scenario in order to make Bush's visit a success, to make it a "heated" visit.

 

Interviewer: But General Ja'fari, we heard the voices of Iranian soldiers threatening the American warships, saying: "We will blow you up." We heard those voices. You're saying that it wasn't real?

General Mohammad-Ali Ja'fari: No, those voices were fabricated. They are not the voices of Iranian soldiers. We aired part of the real footage of what happened, and the rest of it is in our possession. Those voices were fabricated. That footage was fabricated. The voices that were heard did not belong to our soldiers.

 

[...]

If America attacks Iran, our first step will be to defend ourselves, with all our forces and capabilities. We will respond in kind, with all the might of the Islamic Republic. Of course, one cannot compare the power Iran has today to the power we had at the start of the war imposed on us by Saddam Hussein. Saddam launched his attack less than two years after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, and we were not ready to defend ourselves. Nevertheless, we defeated this enemy, which enjoyed the support of all the world's powers. Today, 30 years after the victory of the Revolution, we have gained war experience, and we have a lot of weapons and military equipment, and the ability for self-[production], and there have been excellent developments in this field, and our forces are better than they were in the days of the war imposed upon us. We can now defend ourselves against an American attack. America enjoys superiority only in the air, as well as in electronics and in military technology. In light of our past experience in wars and in light of the recent wars in the region, and the studies we conducted... They know that our equipment and military capabilities are inferior to theirs, and we do not have the technologically advanced weapons they have. But thanks to our special preparations, we can thwart their aerial attacks – just as has been the case in many countries in recent years. In any event, Iran will defend itself with all its might and will respond in kind. In my opinion, we can make America regret any such initiative.

[...]

Ja'fari: It so happens that the military presence of the American forces around Iran... They think that they are besieging Iran militarily, but this presence endangers the Americans themselves, as they know very well.

Interviewer: In what way?

General Mohammad-Ali Ja'fari: They may be hit by our long-range and short-range weapons, as well as our artillery and medium-range missiles. This American presence in the region and around Iran does not constitute one of their strengths. On the contrary, this is a weakness of theirs, in the military sense. An American analyst wrote this in an article I read, and it is true - unless one expects them to carry out a land attack on Iran. We do not anticipate that they will carry out such an attack. In our opinion, this is impossible. I do not expect the American military forces or the politicians in America to lose their minds and conduct such an attack, because such an operation is bound to fail.

 

[...]

Interviewer: When you say this is a weakness, are we to understand that you will attack all the places in the region where the Americans are present?

General Mohammad-Ali Ja'fari: Yes. The presence of the American forces in the region... If the American forces attack our land from any place, it is only natural for us to respond in kind. It is our natural and inalienable right to respond against the forces that attack our country. I know that there is concern among the neighboring Muslim countries, because there are American military forces in some of them. But if a war breaks out against us and if the American forces attack us, we have the right to respond against those forces. If they use any place to attack Iran, we may attack them with missiles. We have declared this. Of course, we will take into consideration the need to avoid endangering the peoples of the region. We will make sure to target only the American forces attacking us. We have the weapons and the missiles, as well as the necessary precision, which will enable us to target only the American military forces attacking us.

 

Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Mardi 29 janvier 2008 2 29 /01 /Jan /2008 07:32

Mohammad Shariati, Advisor to Former Iranian President Khatami, Criticizes the Ahmadinejad Government on Its Foreign and Economic Policies and Its Support of Hizbullah, Iraqi Militias, and Hamas

 

Following are excerpts from an interview with Mohammad Shariati, advisor to former Iranian president Mohammad Khatami, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on January 19, 2008.

Interviewer: [Ahmadinejad] is the right man in the right time, using the right means, and consequently, his foreign policy and his discourse are right too. Do you agree with this position?

Mohammad Shariati: No, I don’t. First of all, in the elections, foreign policy issues have little impact on public opinion, and these issues are dealt with in broad terms only. All the presidential candidates agreed on the basics of our foreign policy.

[...]

Our foreign policy under Ahmadinejad could have yielded better results, if the methods of previous [governments] had been used. With regard to foreign relations and the countries of the region... When President Ahmadinejad was elected, he had very little experience in foreign policy, compared to his experience in other fields. Iran’s initial conduct vis-à-vis its neighbors –the most important aspect of Iran’s foreign relations, as was determined by the National Security Council – is different from Iran's conduct today, two and a half years later. The government has returned to the language of previous [governments], and to their attitude towards friendly countries, as well as to their [policy] regarding the nuclear issue. The previous governments emphasized international cooperation, as well as transparency towards the U.N. and its agencies. They did not say - as we now hear time and again - that we would withdraw from the NPT and similar statements. In addition, Larijani resigned because he reached the conclusion that the path taken by Khatami, Rafsanjenei, and Al-Rowhani on the [nuclear] issue is more realistic than the path taken by Ahmadinejad. With regard to Iraq too - , in my opinion, if a reformist policy had been employed, Iran would not have committed all its mistakes in Iraq, and the problems we face throughout the Arab world would have been avoided. [Iran] supported some of the militias, which had no understanding of the Sunni–Shiite issue, and acted tyrannically. In my opinion, if they had adopted a reformist policy, as was the case in the past, there would have been fewer perils and fewer alliances against us

[...]

The factories used to operate for longer hours, there was work, and the standard of living was higher. Everybody admits that investments have declined significantly, and that [the government] signed fictitious contracts that have not been implemented, because others avoid investing here, and [the government] wants to create the impression that it has investments, because the price of oil has changed.

[...]

Even the government admits that this is the situation, but says that this is the price of our steadfastness, and that it is due to the external pressure and the international resolutions

[...]

[This government] supported peoples in the region because they are Shiite or of Iranian origins. In contrast, in the governments of Rafsanjani and of Khatami, we have reached the conclusion that the [Shiite] citizens of these countries can achieve their rights better than we can defend these rights. With regard to Hamas and Hizbullah, one cannot sever our ties with the peoples, because ties between peoples are the essence of the Revolution, but these relations must be within a general framework, avoiding internal differences. Take Lebanon, for example. If there is a conflict there, we must invest all our efforts into resolving this domestic conflict. We have seen others who came to Lebanon, and said that interference in domestic affairs is not allowed.

[...]

During the civil war, we had ties with everybody. Today, Iranian diplomacy does not accept Siniora, for example. In my opinion, this is a flaw.

[...]

If we want to support Hamas, we must exert pressure on it with regard to national unity.

Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Dimanche 20 janvier 2008 7 20 /01 /Jan /2008 10:53
"Mais enfin, quel est l'objectif recherché à Gaza ? "
Les raids israéliens dans la bande de Gaza en représailles aux tirs de roquettes palestiniens n'ont abouti qu'à une escalade de la violence. Yediot Aharonot met sévèrement en cause la ligne politique du gouvernement Olmert, ainsi que la confusion de ses décisions militaires.
Des soldats israéliens entrent dans la bande de Gaza, 15 janvier 2008
AFP
Les Israéliens sont en droit d'obtenir du gouvernement une réponse précise à une question fondamentale : quel est l'objectif recherché par Israël à Gaza ? Ce n'est que lorsque nous aurons obtenu la réponse à cette question que nous pourrons élaborer une stratégie, débattre de la tactique à adopter et en discuter au Conseil des ministres. Nous avons besoin de connaître le pourquoi et le comment de nos tirs et, surtout, nous avons besoin de savoir sur qui nous tirons.

Ces derniers jours, le Premier ministre Ehoud Olmert vantait sa gestion "prudente" et "mesurée" du conflit à Gaza. Selon ses collègues, il s'agit d'une preuve incontestable que les leçons de la deuxième guerre du Liban ont été intégrées. Pourtant, à certains égards, la gestion de la guerre à l'été 2006, aussi pitoyable qu'elle fût, reste toujours meilleure que celle de la crise actuelle. Avant que le gouvernement Olmert ne s'embarque dans la guerre au Liban, il avait présenté ses cibles – peut-être étaient-elles imaginaires, injustifiées et absurdes – mais, au moins, nous avions des cibles. Aujourd'hui, quelle est notre cible ?

Tandis que les Israéliens sont pris dans un débat virtuel pour savoir s'il faut ou non lancer une vaste offensive terrestre dans la bande de Gaza, les forces armées manœuvrent déjà sur le terrain. Tout se passe exactement comme lors des premières semaines de la guerre au Liban – les troupes ne sont engagées, nous dit-on, qu'"à quelques kilomètres à l'intérieur" ; il s'agit "d'opérations limitées" dans le but d'"empêcher les tirs de roquettes"…

Cette présence crée des tensions et ces tensions entraînent une escalade de la violence, chacun ripostant aux ripostes de l'autre. Une fois de plus, la politique étrangère et de défense d'Israël se retrouve dans les mains de quelques commandants de divisions et de brigades. Pourtant, même les chefs militaires sont priés de "s'en tenir à leur mission et à leur objectif". Mais alors, quel est leur objectif ?

Alors que le Hamas était pratiquement à genoux le mois dernier et réclamait un cessez-le-feu, les responsables de la défense nous ont convaincus qu'il fallait continuer à frapper et, comme d'habitude, ils nous ont expliqué qu'une accalmie donnerait justement au Hamas le temps nécessaire pour se préparer et s'armer en vue du conflit – on connaît cet argument imparable. Pourtant, le moment est venu de poser une question qui vient mettre à mal cet argument : quel est l'objectif de cette guerre et que faudra-t-il considérer comme une victoire ?

S'il s'agit de mettre un terme aux tirs de roquettes Qassam, alors l'actuelle escalade s'avère contre-productive puisque les tirs ont augmenté de manière exponentielle. Et une fois admis qu'Israël ne fantasme pas sur une quelconque autre étape destinée à "marquer les consciences", ce qui permettrait à Mahmoud Al-Zahar [dirigeant et membre fondateur de Hamas ; son fils a été tué le mardi 15 janvier par les raids israéliens] et à ses camarades de se convertir au judaïsme et de se mettre à mâcher des rameaux d'olivier, il est peut-être temps de mettre en route le processus de maturation collective, même s'il s'agit d'un processus douloureux.

On ne peut pas tuer impunément 18 habitants de la bande de Gaza lors de frappes aériennes et ensuite se lamenter quand le Hamas démontre une fois de plus ses impressionnantes capacités de tir. On ne peut pas déployer des soldats et se lancer dans des opérations militaires le matin et, dans la soirée, exprimer de "sérieuses inquiétudes sur les négociations concernant Gilad Shalit [soldat israélien enlevé et détenu depuis le 25 juin 2006 dans la bande de Gaza]". Un gouvernement souverain doit être capable d'identifier le lien de cause à effet, le lien entre les moyens et les objectifs.
Uri Misgav
Yediot Aharonot
OAS_AD('Left1');
Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Dimanche 20 janvier 2008 7 20 /01 /Jan /2008 10:50
Assassinats ciblés : assiste-t-on à une « libanisation » de la Casamance ?
Alors que l’assassinat rocambolesque et atypique, perpétré le 30 décembre 2006 en Casamance (sud du Sénégal), sur El hadji Omar Badji, haute personnalité sénégalaise et proche du président Wade, n’a pas soufflé sa première bougie funèbre, et que l’enquête n’a officiellement rien révélé, le Sénégal a perdu dans les mêmes circonstances et dans la même région une autre haute personnalité: Chérif Samsidine Dino Néma Aïdara, 48 ans, chargé de mission à la présidence de la République. Vu sous l’angle des points et traits communs entre les deux hautes personnalités d’une part, mais aussi, comparés d’autre part à ce qui se passe depuis maintenant plusieurs mois au Liban, peut-on alors parler d’une «libanisation» de la Casamance?

C’est une lapalissade que d’avancer que le double assassinat en moins d’un an, en Casamance, de hautes personnalités comme El Hadji Omar Lamine Badji et Chérif Samsidine Dino Néma Aïdara n’a pas été de tout hasard. Ces assassinats sont loin d’être accidentels. Surtout, si l’on se fonde sur le mode opératoire des assaillants. Lequel est devenu un secret de polichinelle dans cette partie du pays d’Abdoulaye Wade qui en a connu plusieurs au fil des 25 ans de conflit indépendantiste.

 

Une nouvelle forme de signature des forfaits ?

 

Avec la double exécution d’Omar Lamine Badji ex-président du Conseil régional de Ziguinchor (455 km au sud de Dakar) et de Dino Aïdara chargé de mission à la présidence de la République, on est en droit de penser à une « nouvelle » forme de signature. Une signature d’autant plus identique ici et là que, selon les témoignages, les deux maisons des victimes sont encerclées par les assaillants ; un petit groupe entre, histoire de bien les identifier, avant de passer à l’acte. Pour finir, les assaillants mettent tout bonnement le feu à la maison comme qui dirait, dans le but d’enrayer toutes traces susceptibles d’ébaucher une piste aux enquêteurs.

 

Avant de tomber sous le feu de leurs assaillants, qui n’ont certainement pas choisi leur jour au hasard, à savoir la veille de l’Aïd El Adha, Omar Lamine Badji et Samsidine Aïdara ont semblé avoir été suivis au millimètre près par ceux-ci. Au sens où leurs itinéraires du jour de leur assassinat les ont menés de Ziguinchor à leurs domiciles familiaux respectifs, après une courte escale à Bignona, une ville secondaire de la Casamance. L’heure de leur « mise à mort », 21 heures GMT, n’en est pas moins éloquente. Et puis, pourquoi, les témoignages recueillis ici et là aidant, les assaillants parlent-ils de « mission à accomplir » dans le cas de Omar Lamine Badji et d’« ordre à exécuter » concernant la mort du Chérif ?

 

Les forfaits portent quelle signature ?

 

D’ailleurs, en matière de signature, même si tous les observateurs de la crise casamançaises, ou presque, ont parlé d’éléments supposés appartenir au Mouvement des forces démocratiques de la Casamance (MFDC), un mouvement qui revendique l’indépendance du sud du Sénégal, ceux qui sont directement impliqués dans la dynamique de résolution de ce conflit ont vite pris les devants (officiellement parlant), micros ouverts et caméras braquées sur eux, pour dire que « non ! » ce n’est pas la signature du MFDC. C’est le cas de l’actuel ministre sénégalais des transports aériens. M. Farba Senghor n’a-t-il pas dit urbi et orbi qu’à aucun moment l’assassinat du Chérif chargé de mission à la présidence de la République ne saurait être le fait des « rebelles » du MFDC. Puisque, selon lui, en tant que « plus grand défenseur des rebelles » et connaisseur de « tous les camps », citant au passage quelques-unes des bases rebelles, il serait absurde de penser que le maquis du MFDC se serait rabaissé à ce point. Ce qu’il a dû omettre de dire, c’est que les camps en question sont sous le contrôle de la coalition regroupant les flancs des chefs rebelles Ismaïla Magne Diémé et César Atoute Badiate. Et que ces derniers sont évidemment acquis à la cause de la paix dans la région méridionale du Sénégal. Mais il y en a qui sont carrément hostiles à la paix. Par exemple l’autre Salif Sadio, un autre chef rebelle dont on dit qu’il s’est établi en Gambie, cette ancienne colonie anglaise enclavé dans le Sénégal. Si bien que disculper, tout de go, tout le monde au profit d’une hypothétique jalousie, prend les contours d’une conclusion hâtive ; même si c’est un avis personnel. Un avis qui reste toutefois celui d’une autorité étatique.

 

Une piste a priori sans fin ?

 

A la différence du président Wade qui, s’exprimant sur le double assassinat de Omar Lamine Badji et Dino Néma, a préféré n’indexer personne, se limitant à menacer fermement les assaillants et leurs commanditaires, tout en promettant une somme de 50 millions de CFA, un billet d’avion et un passeport diplomatique aux informateurs (du cas de Omar Lamine Badji), le ministre Farba Senghor lui, a cru devoir disculper certains. Ce, d’entrée de jeu ! Non content, il pointe un doigt accusateur sur les « fossoyeurs » de la paix en Casamance et qui, paradoxalement, ne sauraient être des rebelles. Ce sont ces « jaloux » qui, pense-t-il, ne voudraient pas que la résolution de la crise casamançaise leur soit attribuée, ou, tout au plus, au pouvoir du président Wade. De ce fait, non seulement Farba Senghor ébauche une piste à la destination incertaine, mais aussi la déduction prématurée faite des premières informations ne pourrait-elle pas induire à confondre les exécutants et leurs commanditaires ? Or, à la vérité, rares sont les cas de forfaits de ce genre où les exécutants sont ceux-là qui décident de ce que demain sera fait. Et cette thèse est si plausible que, selon les témoignages recueillis auprès des familles respectives éplorées, les membres du commando s’étant introduits dans le domicile du chargé de mission du président Wade auraient parlé « d’ordre à exécuter ». La télévision nationale sénégalaise a révélé que les assaillants s’exprimaient, entre autres langues, en anglais. Si tel était le cas, qui donnerait alors les ordres ? Qui en seraient les exécutants ?

 

Libanisation de la Casamance ?

 

Il n’est pas besoin d’être un expert en investigations criminelles pour qualifier les assassinats de personnalités en Casamance d’exécutions ciblées à l’image de celles vécues depuis 2004 au Liban. Celles-ci, rappelons-le, ont brusquement interrompu la vie d’au moins huit personnalités en trois ans. La dernière cible des malfaiteurs a été le général François El-Hajj, chef des opérations de l’armée libanaise. L’homme avait quasiment atteint la cime de son ascension lorsqu’il avait été la cible « privilégiée » de ses assassins. Alors, selon toute vraisemblance, son imminente nouvelle fonction ne devrait pas arranger ces derniers. Au regard du film et des circonstances des deux forfaits perpétrés en moins d’un an en Casamance, force est de reconnaître une certaine similitude entre les attentats à la vie des personnalités libanaises et les exécutions au pays de M. Wade. D’abord, parce que Omar Lamine Badji et Dino Néma étaient des personnalités au charisme incontestable. Le premier était le patron des militants du parti de M. Wade dans le plus grand département du sud du Sénégal, dont il était aussi le président du Conseil régional. Au plan national, Omar Lamine Badji était non seulement membre du comité directeur du PDS, l’instance suprême du parti au pouvoir, mais aussi il était extrêmement proche du chef de l’Etat sénégalais, M. Abdoulaye Wade. Mieux, il était son ami personnel. Quant au chargé de mission, il bénéficiait des mêmes faveurs, de la part du président Wade. Lequel le considérait comme son propre fils. Dino Néma était aussi un collaborateur dont le président sénégalais ne pouvait plus se passer pour se mettre à jour par rapport à l’évolution du processus de paix en Casamance. Il était si proche du résultat final, à savoir le dépôt et l’incinération des armes en Casamance que M. Wade n’en croyait pas ses oreilles lorsque M. Ousmane Ngom, ministre de l’Intérieur, lui en avait annoncé la mort tragique. En définitive, les questions, subsidiaires soient-elles, qui méritent d’être posées, sont de savoir : pourquoi les assassins ciblent-ils les personnalités si proches de M. Wade ? Ou bien est-ce le fait d’un pur hasard ? Quoi qu’il en soit, le maire de Ziguinchor, Robert Sagna, a assimilé ces assassinats de « situation préoccupante ».

 

 

 

 

Boubacar Diassy

 

Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Dimanche 20 janvier 2008 7 20 /01 /Jan /2008 10:44

Saudi Women's Rights Activist Wajiha Al-Huweidar Criticizes Middle Eastern Men and Saudi Society and States: The Condition of Saudi Women Is Worse Than in Guantanamo

 

Following are excerpts from an interview with Saudi women's rights activist Wajiha Al-Huweidar, which aired on Al-Hurra TV on January 13, 2008:

Wajiha Al-Huweidar: We have raised a generation – I think it began with my own generation – on the belief that we are a special people, that we are the cradle of Islam, that the truth is ours and ours alone, that we are the Saved Sect of Islam. People have begun to believe all these lies, and they use them as pretexts. When we demanded that women be employed in public workplaces, they say: "No, we are a special people." When we demand that women be allowed to drive, they say: "No, we are a special people." No, we are not. In what way are we special? There is nothing special about us. True, we have the two holy cities – Mecca and Al-Madina – but this does not mean that we have a monopoly on religion, and that we are the only Muslims in the world.

[...]

This Saudi patriarchal culture has become prevalent under religious guise, but if you examine everything that goes on in this society, none of it has anything to do with religion. How can it be that people are stripped of their individual judgment, and the Commission [for the Prevention of Vice] is sent to spy on people in the streets, and to determine who errs and who acts properly? Who gave them the right to do this? People have the right to decide for themselves what they do and don't want.

Interviewer: Should women be allowed to decide this for themselves?

Wajiha Al-Huweidar: Of course. After all, they are like any...

Interviewer: Despite this commission?

Wajiha Al-Huweidar: This commission must be abolished, and the day will come when it will be. Look, the early signs that a wrong ideology is dying are fanaticism and extremism. This is obvious. Have you ever seen a dead body that is soft? When the person dies, the body becomes rigid. Similarly, this ideology will become increasingly rigid, and will reach the height of fanaticism, but it is constantly in the process of dying. Take a look at history. Let's examine what happened to the Church in Europe. It becomes rigid and persecuted ideologies, killing and burning scientists, until people rebelled against it, and this led to its collapse. History tells us that this holds true for all ideologies. Communism...

Interviewer: Are you seeing signs of this collapse?

Wajiha Al-Huweidar: This will not happen in our generation. It will take time, but it will happen.

[...]

We, in the East – and I am talking about the East in a broad sense, including Pakistan, Turkey, and the Kurds... The way I see it, these are all wretched people, wretched men. This is obvious. He who has nothing cannot give anything to others. These men have lost what could have given them a real sense of masculinity. They draw their masculinity from Islam, if they are Muslims, of if they are non-Muslims, from the customs and tradition of the very harsh society that gives men more rights than women. Hence, they do not draw any strength from within. In the case of our Saudi society, they draw their strength from the weakness of women too. Most women choose to be weak, because it makes their lives easier. The weaker the wife is, the stronger the husband feels. How can you rely on a man who does not draw his strength from within?

[...]

Do not forget that Eastern men are oppressed both by society and by the authorities. Men face the authorities more than women, and the authorities in Eastern countries are very harsh, to the point that a person can vanish, without anybody ever knowing what happened to him.

[...]

Saudi men strut around like peacocks, as they say, because they were given more than they deserve, and they have authorities beyond what they are capable of bearing. The Saudi man believes he should be president. The moment he graduates from university, he wants to become president. I know that men will say that I am generalizing, but I am talking about the phenomenon, about the vast majority. How come you can hardly find any Saudi laborers? My father was a laborer, and so were many of his generation.

[...]

I do not understand why there is no room for other religions in the vast land of Saudi Arabia. To this day, there is no church for the Christians, no synagogue for the Jews, and temple for the Hindus, even though they constitute a large part of the foreign communities in Saudi Arabia. There are 6-8 million of these people.

Interviewer: There is the notion that Saudi Arabia is the cradle of Islam, as you've said, and that it is the most conservative Islamic conservative Islamic country. That is the response you usually get to such questions.

Wajiha Al-Huweidar: Why do we fear other religions? What frightens us? We should have confidence in ourselves and in our religion. There is no religious text that prohibits the establishment of a church or a temple of any religion. If they want to oppose this in Mecca or Al-Madina – there could be a justification for this, but in the other cities, where there are many foreign workers... How can this be justified? It could be justified because these cities are holy to Muslims, even though Mecca... In my opinion, Mecca should be opened to all the Muslim and non-Muslim peoples of the world. How come the Sheik of the Haram Mosque, to this day, comes from the same family and from the same region – Najd.

Interviewer: What family?

Wajiha Al-Huweidar: It is passed down from father to son in the Subayyil family. Why only this family, and why must it be a family from Najd? How come Saudis have a monopoly on Islam? Are the Saudis the only Muslims? If we want to spread the notion of tolerance towards other religions and sects, the Haram Mosque should be given to the different sects.

Interviewer: Which sects?

Wajiha Al-Huweidar: All of them. Why must the Sheik of the Haram Mosque be of the Hanbali school? Why can't there be a Hanbali sheik one day, and on other days, sheiks form the Shafe'i, Maliki, Hanafi, Ja'fari, and Isma'ili schools? Why can't there be sheiks of other nationalities? Why only Saudis?

[...]

Saudi society is based on enslavement – the enslavement of women to men and of society to the state. People still do not make their own decisions, but it is the women of Saudi Arabia who have been denied everything. The Saudi woman still lives the life of a slavegirl. So in what way are we different from Guantanamo? At least in the case of Guantanamo, many prisoners have been releases, while we remain in this prison, and nobody ever hears of us. When will we be freed? I don't know.

Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Jeudi 10 janvier 2008 4 10 /01 /Jan /2008 07:44
Le mouvement du Hamas organise de grandes manifestations pour condamner la visite de Bush
 
[ 08/01/2008 - 12:04 ]
 
 
Gaza – CPI

Le mouvement du Hamas organise une série d'activités populaires et de manifestations contre la visite du président américain George W. Bush dans la région, le considérant comme le grand responsable des souffrances que subissent les Palestiniens dans les villes et villages de la Cisjordanie et de la bande de Gaza.

Le porte-parole du département des activités populaires du Hamas, Achraf Abou Dia, a affirmé que le mouvement se prépare pour organiser plusieurs activités populaires condamnantla visite de Bush dans les territoires palestiniens.

Abou Dia a dit dans ses déclarations de presse, aujourd'hui mardi 8/1, que ces activités vont porter un message fort au président Bush affirmant que les Palestiniens refusent sa présence sur leur territoire saint, car il est le premier responsable des crimes sionistes continuels contre les Palestiniens en Cisjordanie et dans la bande de Gaza et des désaccords palestiniens internes.

Il a déclaré que de grandes marches vont être organisées dans les rues de la Bande, appelant toutes les factions et les hommes libres à participer à ces activités pour exprimer leur refus de cette visite qui vient soutenir la position sioniste.

Dans le même contexte, le leader du Hamas Ismaïl Ridan a condamné la visite prévue de Bush en affirmant que le peuple palestinien refuse cette visite qui ne sert que les intérêts de l'occupation sioniste.

De son côté, le membre du comité central du front populaire pour la libération de la Palestine Jamil Mazhar a considéré que cette visite représente une couverture aux crimes de l'occupation pour l'encourager à poursuivre ses agressions contre les Palestiniens.

Il a condamné la position de la communauté internationale et de l'ONU en affirmant qu'on ne peut pas comprendre le silence international envers les crimes sionistes continuels contre le peuple palestinien.
Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Mercredi 2 janvier 2008 3 02 /01 /Jan /2008 08:43
 
Les Sionistes montrent leur obstination pour tout accord final
 
[ 01/01/2008 - 23:03 ]
 
 
Palestine – CPI

Un document concernant les négociations de Taba et de Camp David des années 2000 et 2001 a été publié. Il avait été envoyé du bureau du premier ministre de l’époque Ariel Sharon au bureau d’Ehud Barak devenu à son tour premier ministre. Ce document montre de façon claire un entêtement sioniste chaque fois qu’on discute des accords finaux.

Le document publié par le journal hébreu Haaretz précise que les principes vus dans le conseil des ministres tenu avant la conférence d’Annapolis ressemblent énormément à ceux délimités par Barak.

Le sous-titre du document est : « La réalité actuelle de l’opération politique avec les Palestiniens ». Il met sous lumière un accord entre les deux parties sur la constitution d’un Etat palestinien pour donner aux Palestiniens leur droit à l’autodétermination. Le document rapporte que les Palestiniens sont divisés quant à la reconnaissance de l’Entité sioniste comme étant « un pays du peuple juif ».

Par le document, on sait maintenant que les Sionistes ont proposé des principes qui leur sont vitaux. Ils ne veulent transférer aucuns territoires à l’autorité palestinienne avant un accord final sur toutes les affaires fondamentales. Et avant cet accord, il n’y aura pas d’accord partiel, considérant toutes les affaires comme liées entre elles.

Selon le document, dans les négociations de Taba et de Camp David (2000-2001), les Palestiniens ont grandement protesté contre les exigences sécuritaires israéliennes et contre un Etat palestinien désarmé. Ils ont aussi voulu arriver à un « accord pour servir de cadre à l’accord final » de façon à traiter toutes les questions essentielles du conflit et à délimiter de grandes lignes et des calendriers temporels pour la solution.

Quant à la question des frontières, le document mentionne que les Palestiniens étaient prêts à montrer une certaine souplesse. Ils ont accepté quelques changements sur les frontières du 4 juin 1967 pour qu’elles puissent répondre aux exigences démographiques de l’Entité sioniste. La différence d’avis concerne toujours la définition de 100% des territoires et de la démographie.

Le document montre aussi que dans ces négociations-là, on n’est pas arrivé à un accord pour déterminer l’avenir de la zone annexée à la ville d'Al-Quds après 1967 et de la zone de la Mer Morte. Tel-Aviv a voulu un changement de terrains à une proportion de 6 à 8 de la Cisjordanie afin de préserver les blocs coloniaux. Les Palestiniens se sont opposées à la notion de blocs. Ils ont demandé que l’échange soit de 1/1 et qu’il ne dépasse pas 3,2% des territoires de la Cisjordanie.

Et sous le titre d’Al-Quds (Jérusalem), le document dit que cette ville aura deux capitales, Jérusalem et Al-Quds. Les Palestiniens ont insisté pour que la ville toute entière soit ouverte. L’Etat d’occupation a besogné selon le principe suivant : « Tout ce qui est arabe est pour les Palestiniens ». Mais, en pratique, ils ont proposé une carte avec des pieds israéliens déchirant les territoires palestiniens. Les Palestiniens ont demandé le contraire.

Quant à la question de la vallée sacrée et de l’ancien bourg, les Sionistes ont voulu pour eux une position spéciale. Les Palestiniens y ont posé leur objection. Ils veulent leur autorité sur les quartiers islamiques et chrétiens, et sur la plupart du quartier arménien. Et dans les zones sacrées chez les Juifs, hors les clôtures, les Palestiniens ont suggéré des arrangements au profit de l’Entité sioniste, sans pour autant arrivé à l’autonomie. Et pour le sanctuaire Al-Maqdasi, il y a eu deux alternatives. Soit sa position reste confuse, soit décidée selon la relation de chaque côté du lieu. Alternatives refusées par les Palestiniens.

Enfin, l’Etat d’occupation a refusé d’assumer la responsabilité des réfugiés palestiniens et de reconnaître leur droit au retour. Par contre, il a accepté de reconnaître leur souffrance et de participer aux efforts internationaux destinés à faciliter le retour d’un petit nombre d’entre eux, avec une participation financière pour leur intégration. Les Sionistes insistaient sur la condition mettant finalement un terme « au conflit et à tous les droits ». De leur côté, les Palestiniens ont réclamé une reconnaissance de la responsabilité des Sionistes dans l’origine et la continuation du problème des réfugiés. Le document cite que les Palestiniens ont montré, durant les négociations, une compréhension de la sensibilité de ce sujet et se sont montrés prêts à en trouver une solution équilibrée.

Par Sammy Bakounine - Publié dans : sambak
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires
Créer un blog gratuit sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Rémunération en droits d'auteur - Signaler un abus